|
Equation: Allosteric EC50 shift |
|
|
Introduction An allosteric modulator can reduce or enhance agonist binding. This model fits entire dose-response curves determined in the absence and presence of a modulator. The goal is to learn the affinity of the modulator for binding to its site, and also determine the value of alpha, the ternary complex constant that quantifies the degree to which binding of the modulator alters the affinity of the radioligand for the receptor site. Step by step Create an XY data table. Enter the logarithm of the concentration of the agonist ligand into X. Enter response into Y in any convenient units. Enter data with no modulator into column A. Enter data collected with a constant concentration of modulator into column B. Repeat, if you have data, for column C, D, E, ..., each with a different concentration of modulator. Enter the modulator concentration (in molar so 1nM is entered as '1e-9') into the column titles. Don't forget to enter '0' as the column title for data set A. From the data table, click Analyze, choose nonlinear regression, and choose the panel of equations: Dose-Response -- Special. Then choose Allosteric EC50 shift. You do not need to constrain any parameters to constant values Model EC50=10^LogEC50 KB=10^LogKB alpha=10^Logalpha Antag=(1+B/KB)/(1+alpha*B/KB) LogEC=Log(EC50*Antag) Y=Bottom+(Top-Bottom)/(1+10^((LogEC-X)*HillSlope))
EC50 is the concentration of agonist that gives half maximal response in the absence of modulator. Kb is the equilibrium dissociation constant (Molar) of modulator binding to its allosteric site. It is in the same molar units used to enter the modulator concentration into column titles on the data table. Alpha is the ternary complex constant. When alpha=1.0, the modulator won't alter binding. If alpha is less than 1.0, then the modulator reduces ligand binding. If alpha is greater than 1.0, then the modulator increases binding. In the example shown about, alpha equals 0.01 so the modulator greatly decreases binding. Top and Bottom are plateaus in the units of the Y axis. Notes
Reference A. Christopoulos and T. Kenakin, Pharmacol Rev, 54: 323-374, 2002 |